TTAF and TBO are the two numbers every lender's underwriter checks before an appraisal is even ordered. Below is what they mean, typical TBO intervals for the engine families FLYING Finance sees most often, and what a clean logbook actually looks like versus what raises a flag.
TBO figures are commonly published industry ranges provided for general orientation; confirm exact intervals against your engine's specific maintenance manual and serial number.
TTAF, Total Time Airframe, is the total number of hours the airframe has flown since new, as recorded in the logbooks. TBO, Time Between Overhauls, is the engine manufacturer's recommended interval, in hours (and sometimes calendar years), before a major overhaul. Together, these are the first two numbers an underwriter checks, because they drive both the aircraft's appraised value and how much runway is left before the next major maintenance event.
A logbook doesn't need to show a brand-new engine to get financed; most lenders finance aircraft well past the midpoint of a TBO interval. What actually gets checked is continuity and compliance: no unexplained gaps in the airframe or engine logs, Airworthiness Directives signed off in the maintenance records, and a documented overhaul or top-end history that matches the hours claimed.
TBO intervals are set by the engine manufacturer and vary by model and installation. These are the commonly published ranges for engine families found across the aircraft FLYING Finance typically finances; always confirm the specific TBO for your exact engine model and any service bulletin adjustments.
| Engine family | Typical TBO (hours) | Common installation |
|---|---|---|
| Continental O-200 / O-300 series | 1,800-2,000 | Certified piston singles (Cessna 150/172 early models) |
| Lycoming O-320 / IO-320 / O-360 / IO-360 / IO-390 / O-540 / IO-540 series | Up to 2,600 (extended via SI 1009BF, July 2026; older airframes may still be at the prior 2,000-2,200 base pending compliance) | Certified piston singles and twins (Cessna 172/182, Piper Cherokee/Archer/Saratoga, Beechcraft Bonanza/Baron) |
| Continental/Lycoming turbocharged variants | 1,600-1,800 | High-performance and turbocharged singles/twins |
| Pratt & Whitney Canada PT6A | 3,600-9,000+ (on-condition programs common) | Turboprops (Pilatus PC-12, Daher TBM, King Air) |
| Turbofan (light jet) | On-condition / hot-section inspection intervals | Cirrus Vision Jet, Embraer Phenom, Citation family |
Often, yes, many aircraft are financed running on-condition past a soft TBO interval, especially with a documented monitoring program (oil analysis, borescope inspections). It gets closer underwriting attention, but it is not an automatic decline.
A period of flight hours accumulating with no corresponding maintenance entries, or a missing logbook volume with no clear explanation. A well-documented explanation for a gap is very different from an unexplained one in underwriting terms.
Yes. Twin-engine piston aircraft finance similarly to a certified single, but currently carry more logbook scrutiny, reflecting softer market demand for that category; both engines' histories get a closer read.
Tailwheel configuration raises insurance cost, but it does not itself raise the financing rate. Rate is driven by airframe type, age, condition, and borrower financials, not gear configuration.
Warbird and vintage aircraft are financeable up to 15 years and 20% down at experimental-equivalent rates, with no radial engine, and the same continuity/AD-compliance logbook standard applies regardless of the aircraft's age.
This needs to be disclosed and documented as early as possible; a lender will typically want a reconstruction from maintenance shop records, the FAA registry, and any available owner records. It's a solvable problem but one that takes time, so raise it before you're deep into a purchase agreement.
The underlying logic (continuity, AD compliance, position relative to overhaul interval) is the same, but turbine engines are far more commonly run on documented on-condition maintenance programs rather than a hard TBO, which changes what supporting documentation an underwriter expects to see.
It's a strong practice, especially on an older or lower-volume aircraft. A logbook review before you're contractually committed can surface a gap or compliance issue while you still have full negotiating leverage.
"Tell me the aircraft's hours since new (TTAF) and how it sits relative to its engine's TBO, and I'll tell you what a lender is likely to ask for next."